Yeah seems your joke does not have a point at all.
Oh and the person saying: "Whether it’s choice or not is irrelevant"
Yeah no, the fact that now there is a choice is exactly what matters.
No one cares about RCS outside USA.
And even there only android users do.
Everybody else is using a messaging app which is much better.
It alone will generate 14% of what the entire nation needs for at least 60 years and probably much more time.
How many times you have to replace the (very green?) batteries needed to store power for an entire nation in 60 years? And the solar plants and others?
They started it, they completed it and now suddenly 14% of their energy is truly carbon free. For probably a century.
And once you build one, building another one won't take so much time.
Yes: nuclear plant:
Over time, Olkiluoto-3 is expected to reduce the need for electricity imports from Russia, Sweden and Norway and lead to lower prices. Olkiluoto-3 will run alongside two existing reactors, eventually becoming Europe's most powerful reactor.
Once regular energy production ramps up in July, the reactor will supply about 14% of Finland's energy at 1,650 megawatts
In what universe filling the world of solar panels and huge huge huge batteries is cheaper or quicker or less polluting?
To me it seems when nuclear power price is considered it is always the highest that can be found while for renewables weirdly it does not consider a lot of factors.
It was too late ten years ago
It is too late today
It will be too late in ten years
It is always too late.
But weirdly it is never too late to be anti nuclear power.
@Instrument_Data
@livellosegreto.it