It's funny I feel this way about the amount of generic Brown-haired gruff man protagonists we got about 15 years back. Without the "they used to be novel", because they've never been novel
Doesn't matter, the false dichotomy is our way is the right way because no one else is trying.
It's a fallacy about creating a binary where there isn't one. Anyone else can start up another initiative. He's not the only option just because he's the only one currently trying.
For the same reasons that the YT algorithm is deliberately mysterious, Valve shouldn't be letting people know how to game systems like this.
Disclaimer: not watched it all
Starting off with a false dichotomy, conflating that no one else is trying so you're their only hope. Makes me want to sit down watch it and pick out any falacies, but let's be honest, that's not likely to happen.
Tell me you don't understand fallacies without telling me you don't understand fallacies I guess.
Yes, but when's the last time you heard of firing execs as a coat cutting measure? How likely do you think it is that it's because it'll let them retain more devs versus because it's required to keep them afloat?
He must have said something right at some point, but it probably wasn't public or immediately parroted by his fan club
Maybe, but it's also something very few people were looking for. The advertising I saw was basically "the old braid looked worse than you remember". OK, but it didn't have enough replay-ability to warrant a second purchase, and that's not considering all the modern indie games it's competing with.
Then there's the $20 price point, which it hasn't quite earned. It's more expensive than the Beyond good and evil anniversary edition.
Here are some other games that are similarly priced: (steam below £16, ignoring sake price)
@Cyberspark
@sh.itjust.works