•

Court Bans Use of 'AI-Enhanced' Video Evidence Because That's Not How AI Works

https://gizmodo.com/ai-image-chatgpt-court-ban-video-evidence-enhanced-llm-1851382045

This AI hype cycle has dramatically distorted society's views of what's possible with image upscalers.

Court Bans Use of 'AI-Enhanced' Video Evidence Because That's Not How AI Works

A judge in Washington state has blocked video evidence that’s been “AI-enhanced” from being submitted in a triple murder trial. And that’s a good thing, given the fact that too many people seem to think applying an AI filter can give them access to secret visual data.

236 comments

See all comments

cucumberbob

•

It’s not just the media who uses this term. According to this study which I’ve had a very brief skim of, the term “hallucination” was used in literature as early as 2000, and in Table 1, you can see hundreds of studies from various databases which they then go on to analyse the use of “hallucination” in.

It’s worth saying that this study is focused on showing how vague the term is, and how many different and conflicting definitions of “hallucination” there are in the literature, so I for sure agree it’s a confusing term. Just it is used by researchers as well as laypeople.