!whitepeopletwitter
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
and if that's not a good enough reason to vote for her, you're a Trump supporter.
And if you vote for her, you're a genocide supporter.
You stand with bigots and fascists
And Kamala has said she will continue shipping weapons to Netanyahu, so she also supports bigots and fascists.
and you are no friend of Democracy.
Is slaughtering innocent children democratic?
I guess it is, as long as you vote for it.
They're both genocide supporters. There's no vote you can cast in opposition to genocide. Either you vote for Harris, who would like the genocide to end if only for the optics, but will continue to support Israel because it's necessary to be elected, or you can vote for Trump, who fully supports the genocide and will side with violent despots if he thinks he can make money on it. Netanyahu wants Trump.
Those are our options.
You're talking about Harris like she's a typhoon or a hurricane, like she's an irrational force we just have to accept.
She's an elected representative, and she can change her positions if we demand that she changes them.
And you demand change by saying you'll take your vote elsewhere if she doesn't meet your demands. Pledging your loyalty to her no matter what is the opposite of getting what you want.
Decades of "vote blue no matter who" is how the Democrats got like this.
There's nothing irrational about it. Harris has looked at the polls, and supporting Israel gets her more votes than not supporting Israel. These are politicians, they aren't moral leaders. They are trying to win votes, and there are a lot of single-issue voters who will not support her if they think she doesn't support Israel. There are not as many single-issue voters who will not vote for her if she supports Israel. I'm one of those people who opposes the genocide, but isn't stupid enough to vote for Trump because Harris isn't standing up to Netanyahu. It's not even a remote threat that I'm willing to consider, because Trump will be objectively and exponentially worse for America and the rest of the world.
because Trump will be objectively and exponentially worse for America and the rest of the world.
That's pure speculation and fear-mongering, and I'm sick of hearing it.
We have actual hard evidence of what a Trump term would be like, because we already lived through one. And as rough as it was (with an attempted coup and everything), Joe Biden's term was exponentially worse for the world, with two new wars, a genocide, rampant inflation, and a cost of living crisis.
What could Trump possibly do that would be worse?
Frankly, after four years of Biden, the Democrats owe Trump an apology.
because Trump will be objectively and exponentially worse for America and the rest of the world.
That's pure speculation and fear-mongering, and I'm sick of hearing it.
Got it. That's all you needed to say, baby. We're done here.
I think all this fear-mongering about Trump is quite telling.
You fearmonger about Trump because it's all you have. You don't have anything good you can say about your own party. No accomplishments to tout. No heroes to laud.
Trump probably won't stop the genocide, but the Democrats will probably start a second or third one if you give them a chance.
Yeah you can stop. You have revealed that you're a Trump supporter. You're not arguing in good faith. You want Trump to win, so you'll say anything that hurts Harris.
I'm not a Trump supporter. I think both candidates are bad. I would like Harris to be better.
I wish the Democrats could have an honest discussion about what they need to do better instead of all this cheerleading. Cheerleading is not going to win them the election.
This isn't just a case of people refusing to say the emperor has no clothes. This is everyone seeing that the emperor has no clothes and raving online about how great the emperor's clothes are as if that will convince everyone.