It's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.
Today in our newest take on "older technology is better": why NAT rules!
Today in our newest take on "older technology is better": why NAT rules!
Indeed, that's correct ula usage, but shouldn't need nat rewriting. The global prefixes just need to be advertised by RA packets
I use openwrt on my home network which uses dnsmasq for dhcp. It can give a static suffix which just works with the global prefix on the interface and the site local / ula prefix it uses
Yeah I'm not using NAT, sorry for the confusion.
My router doesn't support RAs for a ULA range though, so I'm running radvd on my home server.