!communism
@lemmygrad.mlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DalnJ-isI5A
💰Support the channel:Patreon | http://patreon.com/sophiefrommarsLinks | http://linktr.ee/sophiefrommars🥰Follow me on:Bluesky | sophiefrommarsTwitter | htt...
I've been thinking about how marxism might be a reasonable guide for how to make some pretty big life choices lately, and thought I'd share.
There are three broad categories I'm placing work into at the moment: capital intensive, non-capital controlled capital intensive, and labour intensive. I'll explain each below, but the basic idea is that this is about capital accumulation and management. Most of it is intuitive, but I've found it interesting to frame it in a marxist way.
Capital intensive jobs are fairly straightforward: we know that most big companies, be they banks, tech, large manufacturers etc, are both capital intensive, and capital controlled. By that, I mean they embody large amounts of human skill in their accrued capital, and that they are managed by the capitalist class. A car manufacturer, for instance, is an example of this, insofar as they'll have de-skilled their workforce to some extent by applying Taylorist principles and embodying some skills into equipment, to automate difficult or expensive tasks.
Non-capital controlled capital intensive jobs are similar, requiring generally a larger organisation which has fixed assets or complicated enough operations that is controlled either by the state or a co-operative. It requires roughly the same skills to survive and isn't terribly interesting in and of itself, usually. Examples might be civil service departments.
The last group is fairly interesting to me at the moment, and prompted this thought. The labour intensive group is things where there isn't really capital accumulation at all, and skilled labour is the main source of "value add". Skilled builders, craftspeople, anyone who can add value to a material or process simply because they're good at something, with only very simple tools. These kinds of jobs are comparatively rare, and probably the kind of thing luddites wanted to preserve. There is an accrual of skill and experience, but not capital. I've found this group interesting because some jobs that fit this description don't have to interact with accrued capital at all.
That last part is interesting because it begs the question of whether or not there is any mileage in seeking to "decapitalise" certain kinds of work. That's to say, successfully navigating life in a capitalist economy, while eschewing the use and accrual of capital at work.
The way I'm thinking about the above, it feels like we (as marxists) can choose to either invest ourselves in capital-adjacent work that might or might not be controlled by capitalists, or we can aim to work in decapitalised industries. The requirements are, I suspect, very different, and I wonder if the embedded values might be as well.
Just a thought: I'd be keen to know what people think. It is a fresh thought, to me at least, that skilled decapitalised work might be a reasonable starting point in movement building. I suspect it is tacitly what Green minded people are up to, and although it does have a whiff of luddism, I wonder if there's a place for it.
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=qMKJZmpppuI
Climate Defiance disrupted a Democratic Party fundraiser, where rich millionaires and billionaires were gathered. Things turned though when elderly billionaires started scolding the activists, going so far as to say they don't care if they die, further cementing how they actually feel about climate change. @JordanChariton on Twitter SUPPORT Status Coup's ON-THE-GROUND and investigative reporting on the stories the corporate media COVERS UP: https://www.StatusCoup.com/Join Other ways to support Status Coup https://statuscoup.com/donate/ https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/StatusCoup $StatusCoup on CashApp Join this channel's Membership for Exclusive Perks! FOLLOW US: @StatusCoup on Twitter | @StatusCoupNews on Threads | @statuscoupnews.bsky.social on BlueSky SIGN UP for our email list for breaking news alerts and alerts when we're LIVE: https://statuscoup.substack.com Shop our collection of clothes that are both high quality, and from sustainable sources: Get shirts based on different quotes from Jordan Chariton such as 'The United Corporations of America' Now! Get yours at https://www.StatusCoup.com/Store #climatechange #democrats #climateactivism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znCY4C31Zbw
People’s ideas are intimately linked to the sort of lives they are able to live. Take, for instance, ‘selfishness’. Present day capitalist society breeds selfishness – even in people who continually try to put other people first. A worker who wants to do their best for their children, or to give their parents something on top of their pension, finds the only way is to struggle continually against other people – to get a better job, more overtime, to be first in the queue for redundancy. In such a society you cannot get rid of ‘selfishness’ or ‘greediness’ merely by changing the minds of individuals.
edit: read theory, comrades, it is worth it.
Because if you spend enough time on the internet, especially the Western side, you start to hear voices of people who oppose their governments and not enough from those who support it.
Even many who are supportive tend to say that their government is authoritarian.
http://uriminzokkiri.com/index.php?lang=eng&ptype=cfonew&mtype=view&no=48689
《우리민족끼리》홈페지는 조선민주주의인민공화국에 대한 모든 정보를 제공하고 있습니다.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZo8QsLu7jQ
Use the Coupon Code "ANTIFAAUGUST" on anything at leftwingbooks.net for 10% off; this also stacks on top of the 20%-off feminist flash sale on sale texts: ht...