If you'e been wondering how to monetize your fediverse posting ... https://sub.club has good news for you!
"If you post quality content and you've developed a loyal audience, you should be able to ask your most passionate followers to support you with a premium subscription.
That's a promise not available on the Fediverse ...until now."
@dimillian has a short threa announcing availabiilty in @IceCubesApp and sub.club advisor @quillmatiq has more info here.
sub.club's a project of The BLVD, Inc, the makers of @mammoth. I know there was a lot of skepticism when Marc Benioff, Mozilla, Long Ventures et al, funded Mammoth ... with so many good apps out there, how are they expecting to get VC-level returns on their investment? But if sub.club can tap into the creator economy, there's clearly money to be made!
Strategies for the free fediverses
https://privacy.thenexus.today/strategies-for-the-free-fediverses/
The fediverse is evolving into different regions
- "Meta's fediverses", federating with Meta to allow communications, potentially using services from Meta such as automated moderation or ad targeting, and potentially harvesting data on Meta's behalf.
- "free fediverses" that reject Meta – and surveillance capitalism more generally
The free fediverses have a lot of advantages over Meta and Meta's fediverses, some of which will be very hard to counter, and clearly have enough critical mass that they'll be just fine.
Here's a set of strategies for the free fediverses to provide a viable alternative to surveillance capitalism. They build on the strengths of today's fediverse at its best – including natural advantages the free fediverses have that Threads and Meta's fediverses will having a very hard time countering – but also are hopefully candid about weaknesses that need to be addressed. It's a long list, so I'll be spreading out over multiple posts; this post currently goes into detail on the first two.
- Opposition to Meta and surveillance capitalism is an appealing position. Highlight it!
- Focus on consent (including consent-based federation), privacy, and safety
- Emphasize "networked communities"
- Support concentric federations of instances and communities
- Consider "transitively defederating" Meta's fediverses (as well as defederating Threads)
- Consider working with people and instances in Meta's fediverses (and Bluesky, Dreamwidth, and other social networks) whose goals and values align with the free fediverses'
- Build a sustainable ecosystem
- Prepare for Meta's (and their allies') attempts to paint the free fediverses in a bad light
- Reduce the dependency on Mastodon
- Prioritize accessibility, which is a huge opportunity
- Commit to anti-fascist, anti-racist, anti-colonial, and pro-LGBTQIA2S+ principles, policies, practices, and norms for the free fediverses
- Organize!
#fediverse #freefediverse #threads @fediverse @fediversenews
FISA Section 702 Reauthorization: House GOP leadership pulls dueling FISA bills amid backlash!
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/11/politics/house-gop-leadership-pulls-dueling-fisa-bills/index.html
Instead, a four-month extension is attached to the NDAA -- unless it gets removed. Dozens of civil rights and racial justice groups oppose extending FISA in the NDAA.
If you agree, call your Senators TODAY and with a simple ask: "DO NOT put 702 in the NDAA."
House Judiciary Committee advances FISA Section 702 bill with warrant requirements, 35-2
Sen. Ron Wyden says "This is great news for anyone who cares about protecting their privacy from government overreach."
So far the only coverage is @tonya_riley's paywalled Bloomberg News article
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/house-panel-oks-bill-to-renew-rein-in-electronic-surveillance
The bill is H.R. 6570, the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act, sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). It has a lot of similarities to the bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act (where Wyden and Sen. Mike Lee are the Senate sponsors). But there are other bills potentially moving forward as well.... (1/3)
College Board shares SAT Scores with Facebook, TikTok, and others
https://gizmodo.com/sat-college-board-tells-facebook-tiktok-your-scores-gpa-1850768077
"Gizmodo observed the College Board’s website sharing data with Facebook and TikTok when a user fills in information about their GPA and SAT scores. When this reporter used the College Board’s search filtering tools to find colleges that might accept a student with a C+ grade-point average and a SAT score of 420 out of 1600, the site let the social media companies know. Whether a student is acing their tests or struggling, Facebook and TikTok get the details.
The College Board shares this data via “pixels,” invisible tracking technology used to facilitate targeted advertising on platforms such as Facebook and TikTok. The data is shared along with unique user IDs to identify the students, along with other information about how you use the College Board’s site. Tok, and a variety of companies."
How to choose the right Mastodon instance
https://privacy.thenexus.today/choosing-a-mastodon-instance/
An excerpt:
...
One of the challenges for newcomers to Mastodon is that you're faced with a major decision you face when signing up: what server (aka "instance") to choose? Different instances have different focuses: are geographically focused (sfba.social), identity-based (tech.lgbt), interest-based (mastodon.art), professional (infosec.exchange), a group of friends (friend.camp), or even lipogrammatic (oulipo.social, which doesn't allow the letter 'e' in posts). Others are "general purpose", without a specific focus – like mastodon.social, mastodon.ai, and hachyderm.io. The choice isn't irrevocable – you can migrate your account to another instance and keep the list of who you're following and who's following you – but it's still daunting.
Newcomers are often told that it doesn't matter what instance you're on, or encouraged to join mastodon.social (the "flagship" instance, which is the default for mobile apps and spreadmastodon.com). This is really horrible advice, because what instance you're on has a big effect on your experience – and for most people, mastodon.social is not a good place to start.
...
[This is an an updated version of the post I originally did last November. I've tried to double-check that the links all still work, please let me know if I missed any!]
@fediverse@lemmy.ml @fediverse@kbin.social #TwitterMigration #Mastodon
We're here, we're queer, we're federated: How queer, trans, and non-binary people helped create Mastodon and are shaping today's fediverse
https://privacy.thenexus.today/here-queer-and-federated-on-mastodon-and-the-fediverse/
Happy #Pride!
This is a draft version, so feedback is very welcome!
@lgbtq_plus #queer #trans #lgbtq #lgbtqia
.
Should the Fediverse welcome its new surveillance-capitalism overlords? Opinions differ!
https://privacy.thenexus.today/should-the-fediverse-welcome-surveillance-capitalism/
Contents:
- Two views of the fediverse
- The case for "Trust but verify"
- Wait a second. Why should anybody trust Facebook, Instagram, or Meta?
- Why the Anti-Meta FediPact is good strategy
- We're here, we're queer, fuck Facebook
- A few words about digital colonialism
- Now's a good time for instance admins to discuss with their communities
- In chaos there is opportunity!
@fediverse@lemmy.ml @fediverse@kbin.social #fediverse #Meta #FediPact
Don't tell people "it's easy", and seven more things Kbin, Lemmy, and the fediverse can learn from Mastodon (UPDATED)
https://privacy.thenexus.today/kbin-lemmy-fediverse-learnings-from-mastodon/
This adds several new sections to the previous version -- including an update on what's happened since then. Here's the new table of contents:
I'm flashing!!!!!
But first, some background
This is a great opportunity – and it won't be the last great opportunity
Ten days later ...
A few more thoughts on moderation
@thenexusofprivacy
@infosec.exchange