@the_wise_wolf
@feddit.deEither that, or it was a way to build a wide alliance to support Ukraine (with some countries being more eager and some more hesitant to help).
Regardless, it was a half measure and should be abandoned rather sooner than later.
Unfortunately we don't share a common language anymore. The people fighting for "law and order" don't actually mean, that everyone has to follow the same law. For them it's a tool to police minorities and political opponents. In other words fascism.
Ich glaube nicht, dass das Geld einfach verschwinden wird (so wie in Singapur). Aber das System wird halt komplexer und irgendwer wird es vermutlich auch für sich nutzen können (siehe cum-ex).
Wahrscheinlich ist es am Ende nur eine massive Stütze für die Finanzmärkte. Am meisten werden also diejenigen profitieren, die bereits viele Aktien besitzen.
verkompliziert den Geldfluss halt extrem
Das ist auch meine Befürchtung. Vermutlich wird dann in Zukunft argumentiert, dass wir Unternehmen stärker unterstützen müssen, um die Rente zu sichern. Aber erwirtschaftet werden die Gewinne ja trotzdem von der nächsten Generation. Also wird das System nur undurchsichtiger und ineffizienter.
Alternativ kann man natürlich auch in ausländische Unternehmen investieren. Aber dann haben wir auch keinen Einfluss mehr auf diese Unternehmen.
Aber entweder habe ich etwas nicht mitbekommen, oder die Strategie und die Erwartungen werden einfach gar nicht kommuniziert. Wie können wir in Zukunft erkennen, ob die Strategie funktioniert?
Hat die FDP eigentlich mal erklärt, wie das Generationenkapital genau funktionieren soll? Oder ist deren Logik einfach Kapitalmärkte=gut?
The Kremlin has already been hit by drones last year. No nuclear war. Instead you guys have forgotten about it.
It's one indicator of economic health out of many. Unlike many other assets, real estate is immovable. So it has a strong association with the location.
Yes, work from home is a good argument, why falling office prices might not be a big deal. The question then becomes, is this trend more pronounced in Germany than in other countries? Maybe, but probably not.
Also unfortunately the article mentions Signa (commercial) and vonovia (residential) real estate. So there's no clear separation. But overall the trend is true for both.
Property prices are used here as a proxy for the health of the economy.
The author may or may not be concerned about the affordability of homes. But that's a different issue. This is just about absolute prices. And low prices mean low interest in Germany. As the article says, people are interested more in London or Paris.
This leads to fewer investments in the economy and Germany is at risk of falling behind.
The problem is, that the studies on glyphosat are way too small. As far as I know it is not particularly cancerous. That is other weed killers are worse. But Monsanto who did these studies and Bayer who bought Monsanto and miscalculated the risks; they did a poor job with these studies, which caused this massive confusion and are therefore largely to blame themselves for the disaster.
Here is a good video on the topic. It's in German, though: https://youtu.be/2K0TAphTfaI?si=rXimwbUfEY51fSdq
It’s probably safe to assume the studies saying it doesn’t were bought and paid for by Bayer
This btw. is how it works. You have a product you want to bring to the market, so you have to prove it's safe. It's the regulator's job to decided if the provided evidence is enough.