@simplejack
@lemmy.worldShocker, when women lose basic reproductive healthcare rights, their views on abortion legislation and conservative politics change significantly.
Trump totally would’ve won that debate if the moderator didn’t fact check immigrants eating Ohio cats.
If you click into the state by state results that I posted, the click in on swing states and view full results, you’ll see that some of the razor thin wins of the past would’ve flipped if a candidate got a hair of a 3rd party’s votes.
That’s why both the GOP and DNC have been worrying about 3rd parties this season.
The earrings obviously told Harris the correct answers about infant murder and pet eating. It’s not fair.
Only after rambling about eating pets and South Park style abortions of children who have already been born.
I’d argue that you don’t need it in every state. You just need it in enough states to make a 3rd party candidate viable.
Thing is, research organizations have and do survey the public about this. A LOT of pollsters were surveying the public about RFK during this round.
A non-zero amount of 3rd party voters always say they’ll move toward Trump or Harris depending which 3rd party option falls off the pick list.
And when races are tight enough to be decided by a few hundred or a few thousand votes, a small non-zero amount of people can be the difference.