@senoro
@lemmy.mlWhat? The CMA is trying to prevent Microsoft from using their huge amounts of cash to create a gaming monopoly. A good thing for the consumer. The FTC also wants to block this deal from going through.
But it’s not free, is it? It’s paid for by the government via taxes and through donations. The only reason libraries are still free is because the cost to run them is very small and the amount of good that comes from them is very high.
I’m pretty sure it’s 3. I think the proof works by taking a 1 x 1 square and splitting into quarters (1/4 = 1/2^2). So we say we have 3 full quarters and then 1 remaining quarter which we then split up again. And if you keep doing that you will fill in the full square. 3/4 + 3/16 + 3/64 and so on
Athiest memes users try to recognise the huge amount of irony in a post that essentially says “it’s bad for someone to be raised believing in something i don’t believe!! But if they are raised to have the same opinions as me it’s good!!!”
Sustainable practises, especially energy generation are way cheaper than non renewable sources, so why would corporations try to make energy cost more for themselves? And it’s definitely cheaper to wash and reuse glass bottles than it is to fabricate entirely new disposable plastic ones. But the general public preferred not having to return their glass bottles for some change back and would rather have the convenience of the plastic bottle and aluminium can.
Buildings use concrete because it’s cheap and strong, and people want to live in well built, sturdy and most importantly cheap buildings. Obviously, corporations could make their buildings out of more expensive sustainable materials and they don’t because publicly traded companies have a legal duty to make profit and clearly there is not enough of a push from the consumer to make the change to more sustainable buildings worth it.
If you want to change companies you need to show them that with your money, and of course you can always vote for a representative who has environmental interests at heart and they can directly show companies what the consumer wants.
But the truth is, not enough people care enough about the environment to prioritise choosing sustainable companies over consuming endless products.
And you can blame companies for marketing useless or cheap products to the world, which will obviously cause consumers to want it (if the marketing is any good), and this time the main blame is on the government for not putting the environment first and not forcing adverts for unsustainable products to have warnings about their environmental impact. But the government is installed by people (in democracies) and the people clearly don’t care.
Me and you might care, I suspect we both do care deeply. But not everyone cares, and that’s the problem.
Mfs be blaming the corporations when they are the ones using their money to tell the corporations what to do. Of you want corporations to stop destroying the environment, don’t buy products that were made via environmental destruction. Vote with your money, not with your memes.