@jaggedrobotpubes
@lemmy.worldMake the people in your head behave the way they should. They have no agency in your head. It's happening in your head so everything "they" are doing is something you are making them do. "Sorry I was so dumb and wrong, now here's a five paragraph essay on why you were right".
It's exactly as hallucinatory as running the upsetting scenario multiple times. The first time in real life wasn't a hallucination; all subsequent iterations were. So you may as well hallucinate in a way that's less bothersome.
This carries a risk for people who refuse to acknowledge faults and weaknesses of their own. So, try not to give yourself credit you don't deserve.
Imagining you're a movie director and they have to do what you say may bypass some objections to don't this, but that's just an extra layer you don't need
If there's something that needs to be resolved then you might need to handle it differently but this is magic for pure habit busting.
Saying shit that makes me think they'll be a reliably crazy contributor to conversations.
I dont think that's American, it's a shit-ton of custom work to fill all that in. Are Europeans willing to spend 10 times as long worldbuilding their campaigns??
Well shit.
That's a really good point I had not thought of.
👍👍 two thumbs up from the same arm.
At first glance the major takeaway here might be that AI can do gish-gallop but with the truth instead of lies.
And it doesn't get exhausted with somebody's bad faith bullshit.
That's fucking hilarious.
I mean like in an orphancrushingmachine kind of way but I'll take what I can get.