@RustyVenture
@hexbear.netThe number of people I've already seen (and have seen in the last 4-5 years) do the whole "I'm 20-something and don't remember everything about what happened last week, duh-hyuk" bit is hilariously sad. Like on top of making excuses for the rancid milk inside your genocidal cult leader's brain, isn't it a little embarrassing to be this proud of having barely any recollection of your life or the events that happen in it? Isn't that a damning indictment of how overworked and overstimulated you are, or how life under capitalism has fried your brain and erased all meaningful connections to yourself and others? I also can't help but wonder if there's some collective Covid-related memory loss going on with all of this.
Not saying everyone ought to have an encyclopedic knowledge of their entire lives or would under socialism, but sheesh this "tee hee I don't even remember the date of my own father's passing" shit is rather sad.
Frankly I don't think most people will ever want to strap goggles to their head to check their fucking emails or even do any real creative work, and that's why this is one of the dumbest products ever to be shat out of Cupertino. No amount of iterating on the design will change this fact, and no, this will never all be contained in a contact lens or a normal pair of glasses because physics will still exist in the future lol. What we're seeing is the usual hype from fanboys, stockholders, and paid reviewers that will fizzle out within a couple of months.
People comparing it to something like the first iPhone or a smartwatch is also stupid because A) while one can spend a whole day with their face pressed up against a screen, it's not mandatory in order to use them, and B) those devices had inherent value to people right out of the gate. It's almost a no-brainer to see the perks of having a full web browser and responsive touch keyboard on a phone when you're coming from the awful hellworld of the "mobile web," static physical buttons, and the shitty touchscreens of yore. The fuck does a pair of ski goggles do to improve computing compared to my existing laptop, phone, or tablet? On top of it, the Vision Pro seems like the most isolating, lonely, and dystopian sort of device that, like all of the similar facehugging gadgets that came before it, will people off just by looking at it. Just can't see how this gains traction in any form outside of the nichest niches, and Apple doesn't build shit for niche markets for long. This isn't 2001 anymore; they're a multi-trillion dollar phone company that sells computers on the side.
Really wish Apple instead poured their dragon's hoard of cash into optimizing their existing hardware and software instead of this garbage. Hell, there's actually some cool gestures and conventions they've demoed with AVP that could be developed into a device that helps people who require alternate input methods. Imagine if they actually made the Magic Leap but it wasn't just astroturf! I fear other product lines will languish because capitalism is a fuck and they "must" go all in on "the next big thing" or else Tim Cook won't have a "revolutionary" product category under his belt to retire on and/or they'll be facing the repo men by the end of the quarter unless line go up 🙃.
In short, I wouldn't worry about it; this too will flop. The only way people are going to stop using their existing workflow and drop it for this shit is if manufacturers/developers stop supporting them entirely and go all in on goggle computing, which would be suicidal for the industry and probably be met by tremendous backlash from anyone who does anything even mildly productive on a computer or who values doing what they want with the gear they own.
I got this today as well. Didn't know I was still getting Bernie emails. The subject was eyeroll-inducing, but I had to stop at the bit about Trump being the worst president in history. Left a pretty vicious message when unsubscribing and ended it with a cute little quote for good measure.
My god what a disappointment. To think I lost sleep after Super Tuesday in 2020 over this fool
This doesn’t matter to them and you’ll be browbeaten and talked down to regardless. Every counts and they want to be able to hold that meaningless popular vote up as proof that their choice was actually just cheated out of victory by the dastardly Electoral College.
I remember how smug libs were when they were dangling that $2,000 carrot over everyone’s heads in 2020, saying things like “at least we know Biden won’t be vain enough to hold up the process just so the IRS can put his name on the check.”
Then we were shorted $600 (or more, if the clattering neoliberal machine deemed you unworthy of additional help during a pandemic) and that check came with an additional piece of paper with a long winded thing about where this money came from, concluding with “this [$1,400] fulfills a promise I made to you.” So on top of getting fleeced by these slimeballs and gaslit about how “600+1400=2000,” those of us who received our crumbs were treated to a full page ad where Biden congratulates himself for a job mediocrely done. I remember thinking, “surely this was an unnecessary waste of time and ink, and likely delayed the distribution of the checks” but of course because it wasn’t done by a it was fine, and there’s probably an obscure rule that required it so he’s just showing us how a real president is supposed to act, or something .
I have a turbolib friend that was needlessly combative with me when I brought up Joe’s long history of scumbaggery prior to even getting the nomination. I’ve been practicing for this year’s inevitable arguments, but I feel a lot more secure articulating my positions now that I’ve fully broken out of the lib cage.
It's depraved. Could make the same argument about so many things that barely elicited a whimper from libs, too. On Covid, the blatant disregard for the science and killing off all protections, testing/tracking, etc., on immigration, on the bait-and-switch they did with the infrastructure bill and the GND (that they pulled that shit twice shows how little our opinions or our values even matter), on oil drilling, on breaking the rail strike, on mass shootings and Cop City, hell even the episodes where Biden is left wandering around the stage looking around for his invisible friend. All of this would've been met with incredible revulsion and acts of resistance if it was Trump (even if ultimately meaningless because America delenda est).
I was just typing out something similar. I think liberals would absolutely be giving Trump a much harder time than they are Biden over his unconditional support for these atrocities. If Congress had the same composition it does today, I think Democrats would throw up whatever barriers they could to, at least performatively, put guardrails on the president's unfettered support of Israel. They were pretty upset when he moved the US embassy to Jerusalem, but never had any intentions to move it back to Tel Aviv.
Dems would, in my mind, be demanding conditions for weapons sales, more of them would be calling for a ceasefire, they'd draw far more attention to specific instances of the IOF's and Israeli government's barbarism, the complicit media in both Israel and the US, and we'd likely see more vocal support for the pro-Palestine protests going on around the world. I'd wonder if other Western nations would make similar noises criticizing Trump. Would Dems still end up endorsing the inhuman actions they're supporting in this version of reality? Probably. They are still the running dogs of the empire after all, and very much bought and paid for, but I'm certain there would be a much more visible effort to at least appear to have some semblance of morality vis a vis "Bibi's best friend Donald" and the "GOP crazies"—especially with an election on the horizon where Trump wouldn't even be on the ballot. It's too good to pass up, and the optics make them look humane which is a tough thing to do.
The longer this goes and the more nakedly deranged the Biden regime becomes, the more I feel the "Trump would be doing a thousand times worse!!" excuse holds little to no water. The best case you could make on that point is that the natsec ghouls might be able to act through him more effectively because he's a nationalist and a moron, but is that truly any worse than the natsec ghouls doing that already with a president who is an active participant in the game? It's truly insane how the circumstances have brought us to a point where one could credibly argue that Trump would be the harm reduction candidate on this.