"In May, Burgess pleaded guilty to a felony charge of removing or concealing human skeletal remains."
If that is the case, people are a lot stranger then I thought. I thought not hiding and/or stealing human remains was something most people supported. Learned another new thing today
If you have addtional links to information about this case I would be fine taking a look and reanalyzing my position.
If not, please refain from making things up. It pushes people who are more open minded away from your position.
"In May, Burgess pleaded guilty to a felony charge of removing or concealing human skeletal remains."
I don't see the case they could raise unless they want to try to codify whether or not the remains are human at 28 weeks.
Do you have additional link with info to add about this case?
The article does not mention any life threatening issues with the pregnancy.
"In May, Burgess pleaded guilty to a felony charge of removing or concealing human skeletal remains."
They let you hide and steal bodies in India? Guess I learned something new today.
"In May, Burgess pleaded guilty to a felony charge of removing or concealing human skeletal remains."
Yes, I think hiding and/or stealing human remains should remain a crime.
If I am reading this right, this sentencing is not even for the abortion. It is for hiding the body.
The UN is successful in it primary role. It is a forum to keep people talking instead of having a nuclear war.
@FaelNum
@kbin.social