@BynarsAreOk
@hexbear.netIf it was a capture from a video maybe, an actual photo? I think the extreme speed and the zoom here means a level of precision timing that would make this a 1 in a 1,000,000 photo or something.
Your point about Brazil/Bolsonaro is just nonsense. Maybe you're not at all familiar with Brazilian politics so thats fine but while we may debate adventurism, the idea that Bolsonaro when only because of that attempt is absolutely crazy in and of itself.
Bolsonaro won after the Dilma coup in 2016, 4 years of a massive campaign to demonize Lula over the Petrobras corruption scandal. A massive campaign to portray himself as a savior from the corrupt left etc.
But you know what is even funnier? Armed Attack on ex Brazilian President Lula’s Caravan in Paraná
Please don't mistake the shitty conditions of garbage American politics and extrapolate. Lula was in jail and then was almost killed. If Bolsonaro had actualy died? Pretty sure he would not have had a successor and nobody would give a shit. Its unlikely Lula would have won because Haddad is a fucking idiot anyway.
The problem with the left is we take punches, we get sent to jail, and the only conclusion we ever take is "maybe we shouldn't even bother" lol.
This Trump incident got nothing to do with Bolsonaro. Brazil is not a two party "democracy". A country that had an actual military dictatorship literaly less than 50 years ago doesn't need excuses to persecute and kill leftists if they want to.
Political strategy made by babies for other babies. They simply think its best to not leave any room for the dems to blame the "left". Its a win-win. if Biden remains they'll earn some cheap pol capital by keeping their record as good faithful little babies and if he drops out they wont be blamed for it.
This is of course best case scenario and giving them the benefit of doubt. It may just be they're all mostly coward fucks dropping the mask, in Bernie's case I doubt he needs much incentive or strategizing to side with his "friend" Joe.
The interesting thing is that the Chinese strategy for growing further is way different: being an industrial economy, it depends on the other nation being able to acquire their industrial production. In other words, it depends on that nation developing a functioning industry and economy to absorb Chinese products into it, which not only strengthens China, but further weakens the misery-dependent american capital.
This is a good comment overall but I don't know how else to put it but this particular quote goes very much against all the evidence of what the modern Chinese economy actualy looks like.
What you actualy ended up doing was a by proxy regurgitation of the same "overcapacity" argument used by the usual western capitalist propagandists detractors. I'll quote from Michael Robert's excellent take on this issue(China’s unfair ‘overcapacity’) but to summarize, the Chinese economy no longer relies on exports as it used to. The internal consumption is growing steadily and the conditions of the early 2000s are no longer true today.
The rationality of this nonsense is to be found in the Western mainstream view that China is stuck in an old model of investment-led export manufacturing and needs to ‘rebalance’ towards a consumer-led domestic economy where the private sector has a free rein. China’s weak consumer sector is forcing it to try and export manufacturing ‘over capacity’.
But the evidence for this is not there. According to a recent study by Richard Baldwin, he finds that the export-led model did operate up to 2006, but since then domestic sales have boomed, so that the exports to GDP ratio has actually fallen. “Chinese consumption of Chinese manufactured goods has grown faster than Chinese production for almost two decades. Far from being unable to absorb the production, Chinese domestic consumption of made-in-China goods has grown MUCH faster than the output of China’s manufacturing sector.”
I don't think there is much evidence to say China needs some foreign economy to consume their excess production, at best this condition existed some 20 years ago and by the early 2010's was already not relevant. Per the chart above you can see the % of industry tied to exporting peaked in 2006.
China doesn't "depend" on US or any other economy to consume their stuff, though obviously there are strong ties today, the point is China can grow based on their own terms, there is no such dependency that limits Chinese growth.
When you thought the fascist would own up to your silly business deals lol.
Just have to hope the CPC will reply in kind. Not holding my breath though.
You know the thing about conspiracies is that they often underestimate just how bad the real world actualy is.
So forget 9/11, current year American aviation is going through a severe crisis, Blancolirio posted about this recently covering the recent close calls.
So its not like its impossible to have multiple failures and a massive coverup, its just that these failures would have been happening for months before and probably after 9/11.
In the current situation though, its literally a miracle there was no major incident so far, ignoring the Boeing stuff obviously.
Absolute bottom of the barrel most desperate attempt to make Biden's NATO saga relevant lol. You could stop evil Putler's assassins but not the 5 random Ukrainians on a fishing boat from blowing up Nord stream.
Why would you assume he will win in the first place?
This only makes sense if the people behind the Kamala "project" you describe are also the people thinking Biden will win which is clearly not the case right now?
I'm going to guess the views on this tweet is probably more than what he got on his entire channel last month if not 6 months even and he still managed to fuck himself out of an easy $2k through shitposting memes from 2012. Amazing.