That last part is referencing Oct-November 2022 and is definitely no longer relevant today. Besides Putin isn't Hitler in the bunker giving direct orders to fictional divisions. Its perfectly normal for Russian military to have their own internal dialogue, it would be weirder if they didn't !?
lol as if the shit they write when you have the memory of a goldfish that or you're paid by word count and you're running out of ideas.
Always remember the beautiful day the Reddit brigade got a missile up their ass because Russia hacked terf islanders phones lol.
Missile attack on Ukrainian military base was launched after Russian forces hacked into British phones(2)
"If voting changed anything they'd make it illegal."
Is this a good rhetoric considering the history of universal suffrage and all, voting was illegal for large parts of the population throughout history? Of course liberal democracy is shit, but I don't think hard fought concessions necessarily legitimizes the system.
Because the rise of streaming directly competes with long form let's plays? If you want to talk about gaming related content its either streaming, let's plays or commentary.
Also let's plays "evolved" even more into these heavily edited 30 minute videos out of 2-6h footage and most channels can't afford that. Look at channels like Real Civil Engineer and say how are you going to make a "normal" video about CS or whatever while competing with a dipshit that edits his videos for 12yo children? You can't afford this much editing unless you're full time.
Did you watch the Harvester interview? Here he talks about how he would have done KSP 2.
He kind of convinced me because I believed this common sense logic too. Just make a better KSP 1.
But now I don't think KSP 2 being just updated KSP 1 would have worked, as he says. If you lead people to expect complete feature parity with KSP 1 and add new stuff it becomes a huge project(approaching AA-AAA level). And he doesn't say it but the feature parity would definitely include some mods people take for granted too.
The historical analysis is fine but the Ukraine war analysis is not
1- People who keep pointing out how this war is a reversion to WW1 are doing bad history. The US never fought a peer opponent since arguably Vietnam and surely since Korea 50-70 years ago. There is no indication we ever moved away from industrialized warfare. The only thing we have is a biased sample because the US only fought imperialist wars against inferior opponents.
2- Its true that the NATO realized they lack industrial capacity, but the war is not a proof that western modern military is inferior necessarily. Keep in mind the US refuses to give Ukraine access to their top systems. Ukraine doesn't have an airforce to this day, F-16s from 1995 are a unicorn, just like the "Abrams" which turned out to be a literal dozen "export versions" we never even got to see in combat except the one time in Adviivka.
The only piece of modern equipment in Ukraine right now are perhaps the ATACAMs/HIMARS/Patriots systems and particularly the Patriots were sent in pathetic small quantities. Also keep in mind the only confirmed losses by Russian aviation was from Patriot systems.
Its probably true NATO military is inferior, but we've known this since the cold war. The US never had actual technological superiority, look back in history. US fighters getting fucked in Korea because Migs were superior. The number of historical losses of US spy planes to soviet air defenses etc. Point is using Ukraine to jump start a theory about western inferiority is questionable.
3- Dividing BRICS vs NATO is dumb I'm sorry. By definition a block has a leader that is willing to give and enforce their will on other members. This is true for the US but it is absolutely not true for China and BRICS. Maybe if China starts giving a shit about fighting things will change but the industrial capacity of Brazil is decidedly in the hands of American imperialism. The entire Brazilian capitalist class is behold to foreign interests. The same can be said for India.
Also you know its funny when the biggest recent controversy was Lula's shit neoliberal government introducing a new tax to stop poor people from buying cheap clothes from China. The same cheap clothes resold by major Brazilian retailers because Brazil literaly doesn't produce enough cheap quality clothing.
This was quite a political blunder from Lula's government, widely unpopular etc. So please be extremely careful thinking BRICS is some magical NATO-like alliance. Even if it was, the elephant in the room is China is not willing to leverage BRICS anyway into an open war with the US so all the analysis falls apart.
Also btw Brazil was forced to buy weapons from Israel despite Lula's "performance" lol.
The only thing is don't take a T1 city as a representation of the whole country.
I think the videos from people going to Xinjiang or Tibet are more interesting honestly.
The problem is Trump is in full desperation mode, they have nothing on her and they continue to show no coordinated effort. There was some opponenent research leaked on her too and the list was unironicaly "coconut" and "she laughs wierdly".
She is definitely weak against any actual "leftist" Dem that actualy wants to govern or campaign on progressive issues but realy now, she is running against Trump and a campaign that offers nothing but racism and shit politics.
Also Trump is not liked either given Biden was still getting 70% of anti-Trump voters. All she needs to do is get even 1/3 of the country to like her. IMO she is a far and away favorite.
Rule #1 of American politics is never expect either party to be competent, its on Republicans to find something on her and its not looking good for them.
@BynarsAreOk
@hexbear.net