Math equation says, plant eating requires less land, which means fewer workers exploited. Also I'm pretty sure plant farmers don't have a 400% turnover rate. It's almost like even if the math were equal, which it isn't, killing animals all day is bad for your mental health.
two major companies who
Exploit animal bodies on mass scale. I'm shocked they'd exploit children's bodies too 🥴
During the hair falls in my face phase I just used a beanie or hair tie when it got long enough for that. Five years of growth FYI. I don't use product so cant chime in on that. Would just recommend to be sure you find the right conditioner for your hair.
Ive got curly hair so cant recommend brushing like some of the others here. If you have wavy/curly hair look for advice on that.
Or uncompressed audio in multiple languages/different soundtrack variants (original/remaster)
Go back to school. Arguments lead to logical conclusions. Your point is stupid. You are worried about framing in discourse far more than the argument. Just use that brain power of yours to reformat the argument minus the framing you don't like. Such as, 'if anything digestible is morally permissable to digest, that would include babies, which you probably wouldn't morally permit, so perhaps you should find a more useful argument. Babies have meat too.' There, that better? You shouldn't eat animals (or 99.9999999% of them) because they are conscious - entailing varying degrees of thoughts, feelings, social dynamics, and the obvious capacity to suffer - many animals of which exhibit higher degrees of consciousness than a newborn human.
And jfc my dude you responded to the idea of babies being eaten with 'besides, some people are cannibals.' I didn't strawman. You actually said that.
If you still can't figure out how 'my body can digest stuff so its a-okay to eat literally anything digestible' is incredibly dumb even after I've told you where that logic leads then just don't participate in discourse at all and we'll help you get through life since you can't do it on your own. Are you done with the intellectualy dishonest semantics or no?
My point is that our “body” is able to sustain itself on a diet that includes animal meat, out body has evolved to be able to process it. Including babies and dogs.
Your point is stupid and absolutely includes babies and dogs. You can digest those beings just fine.
Besides, while I don’t share their views, there are cultures where eating dogs or practicing cannibalism is common.
'I'm not normalizing eating babies,' proceeds to normalize eating babies
Why can your body digest new born babies and dogs? Why can your body sexually violate them? Dumb take. You dont derive ethics from what your body is physically capable of doing.
I'm sure you feel that way, but no. It's more like ya'll are anti-animal cultists. Possible longterm anti-lifeists where ecological effects of animal agriculture are considered.
Facilitating animal deaths for eating pleasure is intolerant toward animals and their lives. Yet, meat eaters expect Vegans to be nice to meat eaters. In other words, meat eaters expect Vegans to be tolerant of intolerance. One day meat eaters will understand they should rightly be shamed and their behavior and discourse locked out of society, but not today - today they don't understand.
Someday the meat eaters will realize this applies to animal oppressors as well, but not this day.
@BonfireOvDreams
@lemmy.world