•

In an effort to "not show bias" Trump's sentencing is delayed till after the election.

Judge Delays Trump’s Sentencing Until Nov. 26, After Election Day

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/06/nyregion/trump-sentencing-delay-ruling.html

The decision by Justice Juan M. Merchan means voters will be left in the dark about whether the former president will face time behind bars.

Judge Delays Trump’s Sentencing Until Nov. 26, After Election Day

It wouldn't be fair to have your felony conviction negatively impact your opportunities. This is how justice works right?

132 comments

See all comments

OutsizedWalrus

•

No, it’s not mob justice.

Generally, “unfair justice”, like mob justice is assessed by undue, unjust, or extreme punishment. Lack of punishment is not “unfair justice”. The US goes as fair to explicitly ban “double jeopardy” as it does not want “innocent “ people to face undue hardship.

In this case, the possible punishment is 100% within the legal system. At worst, trump receives the same punishment as any other criminal convicted of the same crimes. At best, Trump receives a lighter punishment as the result of the election. There is nothing undue or just about a lighter punishment.

Mob justice is a problem as it doesn’t allow for due process and proper representation. The “convicted” often ends up with non-reversible punishment (like mutilation or death) based on arbitrary “mobs”. Since the only outcome here is a reduced sentence, there isn’t an argument for mob justice.

TLDR: mob justice and similar “undue trials” really only care about wrongful convictions. Wrongful “not guilty” decision are not a “problem”

acockworkorange

•

That is absolutely mob justice. You’re outsourcing the decision to the mob. People who aren’t privy to what happened in court, to the evidence, to anything. In fact, you’re disregarding actual justice, that has reached a verdict, and replacing it with the opinion of the ill informed mob. That’s the mobbest justice to ever mob.