C Sharp
!csharp
@programming.dev!csharp
@programming.devhttps://lp.jetbrains.com/dotnet-days-2024/
Join us on September 25–26 for a free virtual event bringing together the most influential people in the .NET space to talk about topics they’re passionate about, including C#, F#, .NET Aspire, Blazor, HTMX, microservices, ReSharper, and more!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18w4QOWGJso
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/csharp/1158/
Welcome to our third news and event digest for the .NET world! The PVS-Studio team is thrilled to bring you the most interesting and useful insights. Let′s roll!
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/performance-improvements-in-net-9/
Take an in-depth tour through hundreds of performance improvements in .NET 9.
https://careers.unity.com/position/5967481
The oportunity: Unity Engine is used by millions of creators around the world to build powerful and engaging real-time experiences. Underlying these experiences is game code written in C# and targeting .NET.
https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/TypeUnions.md
The official repo for the design of the C# programming language - dotnet/csharplang
Let's say I have a method that I want to make generic, and so far it had a big switch case of types.
For an simplified example,
switch (field.GetType()) {
case Type.Int: Method((int)x)...
case Type.NullInt: Method((int?)x)...
case Type.Long: Method((long)x)...
I'd like to be able to just call my GenericMethod<T>(field) instead and I'm wondering if this is possible and how would I go around doing it.
GenericMethod(field)
public void GenericMethod<T>(T field)
Can I use reflection to get a type and the pass it into the generic method somehow, is it possible to transform Type into <T>?
Can I have a method on the field object that will somehow give me a <T> type for use in my generic method?
Sorry for a confusing question, I'm not really sure how to phrase it correctly, but basically I want to get rid of switch cases and lots of manual coding when all I need is just the type (but that type can't be passed as generic from parent class)
http://anthonylloyd.github.io/blog/2024/07/07/cscheck-happy-state
The happy state of property based testing in C#